The
report that FDI in retail will lead to the creation of 10 million jobs
is not practicable.hat is, if FDI in retail is allowed, a lot of
organised players will be coming in, which would lead to increase in
employment opportunities in the retail sector and associated sectors
such as sourcing and logistics. This can at best be construed as wishful
thinking of the over enthusiastic leaders in the government and
votaries of FDI in retail trading. Now, the question is, if Wall-Mart,
Tesco and similar companies can create millions of jobs, why not
domestic companies in retail sector do the same thing? Why not the
government encourages the domestic companies to create more jobs?
It is true that a few thousands of literate/educated youth will get job
in retail chains and get attractive salary too. Most of those jobs will
be generated at the front-end, in positions such as sales associates,
cashiers, customer services staff, security guards, in-store security
personnel, IT and systems for retail staff, customer relationship
associates, loaders/ unloaders, merchandise refilling staff, department
managers, store managers and regional and national managers. Some of the
new jobs will be in warehousing and logistics-related areas. The rest
will come in manufacturing services such as per-processing and
processing. But what is the guarantee that the displaced persons
belonging to the unorganised retail sector will find employment in the
multinational retail outlets. A few corporate brokers will also get
opportunity to earn considerable amount of brokerage.
Coming to reality, the creation of 10 million jobs is unachievable even
in the long-run, leave alone in just three years, as against the
contention of Mr. Anand Sharma, the Union Commerce and Industry
Minister, who failed to elucidate the ways and means of creating such a
large number of jobs, say in millions, by the multinational retail
giants. Various studies on the impact of global retail giants setting up
retail stores confirm that job losses have occurred everywhere and as a
result disrupted the livelihood of the people. The study by David
Neumark of the University of California and his colleagues in 2007
revealed that for every job created by Big Box retail, 1.4 jobs are lost
from smaller retail stores in the neighbourhood. Another study by Emek
Basker of Missouri University in 2005 concluded that up to 60 jobs might
be lost in 5-6 analysing US counties with an average population of
78,000 (during 1977-1998). Another study on opening of retail shops by
the global giants in Jakarta (the capital city of Indonesia, found that 2
jobs were lost in the unorganised retail sector for every one job
created by the Big Box retail). According to the Madras Kirana
Merchants' Association: รขIt (FDI in retail) is an act not desirable
for any country to create a situation in which a few retail giants
monopolize the major portion of retail trade, This is particularly
applicable to India .
Dr.C.Murukadas , The Times of India, Sep.26,2012
No comments:
Post a Comment