The Prime Minister is spreading false stories about benefits accruing to the
farmers in terms of better prices for their products owing to the
introduction of FDI in multi-brand retail.The stated purpose of
liberalising FDI in retail is that it will attract investments for
modernising India’s supply-chain infrastructure, especially for the
agricultural sector, in turn, providing better returns to farmers and
small agro-processing units through enhanced direct sourcing as well as
curbing inflation by reducing wastage. The argument is that the giant
foreign retail chains will squeeze out the middlemen thereby providing
higher prices to farmers and at the same time provide large investments
for the development of post-harvest and cold chain infrastructure.
Today, in the West, corporate retailers control the entire supply
chain of food and farmers have no alternative but to sell to select
corporate retail giants. This has led to monopoly conditions, where
there is just one or few buyers, farmers have no choice but to sell
their produce at the price offered by them. The general practice is
that in order to maximise the gain, corporations will contract with
farmers and push them for single crop cultivation, using genetically
modified seeds with extensive use of pesticides and chemicals which will
destroy the fertility of land. It is already happening in India and
will only intensify as retailers seek to enter directly in the
agriculture sector. All these claims of showering of benefits to farmers
are fallacious and the big retails have not helped farmers anywhere in
the world. Even in Latin American countries, including Brazil,
Argentina, Uruguay and Colombia, where supermarkets, most of them owned
by multinational giants, now control 65 to 95 per cent of sales, many
farmers have been forced to quit agriculture.Evidences show that farmers
in the West have paid a big price, with hundreds of thousands forced to
abandon their farms, due to corporatisation of the farming sector,
along with corporate control of the purchasing side among processors and
retailers. Therefore, there is no point in giving this stake (i.e.
multi-brand retail trading) to the foreign retailers, albeit to cater
inflation. India might receive some foreign direct investments; but this
will make the situation even worse by displacing the farmers leading to
increase in rural unemployment and poverty. Given the already
over-crowded agriculture sector, and the stagnating manufacturing
sector, and the hard nature and relatively low wages of jobs in both,
many million Indians are virtually forced into the services sector,
particularly in retail trade.( Excerpts from the book authored by this
commentator entitled, “FDI in Retail Trade in India: a Retrograde Step”
by M/s RAC Publications, No. 38 (Old No. 76-A) Choolaimedu,
Chennai-60094.''
The Times of India, Dec.10, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment